7 Best AI Landing Page Generators in 2026 (Tested & Compared)
The best AI landing page generator should help you launch pages that convert visitors into customers, not just create pretty designs that sit unused.
We tested 7 AI landing page generators with the same prompt: a product launch page for "QuillSpark," an AI writing assistant. We asked for a hero section, features grid, product teaser, testimonials, and early-access signup form.
The differences were significant. Some tools created production-ready pages with sophisticated design systems. Others produced generic templates. A few couldn't even publish without payment walls.
In this guide, I'll show you exactly what each tool produced, which ones create pages that actually convert, and which ones waste your time.
What We Tested For:
Criteria | What We Measured |
Design Quality | Typography, color systems, layout sophistication, mobile-friendliness |
UX Writing | Headline clarity, CTA effectiveness, persuasive copy |
Production Readiness | Can you publish immediately without major edits? |
Free Publishing | Can you get a live page without paying? |
Customization | How easily can you edit and refine the output? |
Our Test Deliverables:
•Hero section with signup form
•Features grid (3 highlight cards)
•Product teaser with mockup
•Testimonial carousel (3 quotes)
•Footer with navigation
First, a quick comparison of all 7 tools.
Best AI Landing Page Generators at a Glance
Tool | Best For | Score | Starting Price |
Manus | Production-ready pages with free publishing | 9 | Free |
Base44 | Full app building with transparent AI | 9 | Free |
Aura | Design flexibility with Figma integration | 8 | Free |
Simplepages AI | Fastest prompt-to-publish workflow | 7 | Free |
Emergent AI | Basic pages with clarifying questions | 7 | Free |
Squarespace | Guided block-based building | 6 | $16/mo |
Involve.me | Not recommended (failed our test) | 4 | $29/mo |
1. Manus
Score: 9/10
Best For: Production-ready landing pages with free publishing and SEO optimization
Manus delivered the most polished, production-ready landing page in our testing. Strong UX writing, smooth animations, realistic testimonials, and a rich footer, all mobile-friendly out of the box. And critically, publishing is included in the free plan.
What Makes It Stand Out
The design quality exceeded expectations. Manus chose a "Modern Minimalism with Soft Gradients" aesthetic featuring:
•Typography: Playfair Display (serif) for headlines paired with Inter (sans-serif) for body text
•Color Flow: Cream background with lavender-to-midnight-blue gradient accents
•Visual Language: Glassmorphic cards, soft shadows (0 8px 24px), 12-16px rounded corners, asymmetric layouts
•Interactions: Smooth scroll-triggered reveals, hover lift effects, bouncy transitions (200ms ease-out)
The AI explicitly avoided generic centered layouts, instead creating a premium, craft-focused landing page.
Our Testing Experience
We entered the QuillSpark prompt. Manus walked through its process transparently:
1.Project initialization — Set up the static web scaffold
2.Design strategy — Created a document with three distinct approaches, then selected Modern Minimalism
3.Visual assets — Generated custom hero gradient background, product mockup, and feature icons
4.Typography system — Added Google Fonts for Playfair Display and Inter with custom color palette
5.Component building — Built each section: hero, features, teaser, testimonials, footer
6.Deployment — Published to a live URL (quillspark-uiwsa9nc.manus.space)
The result included:
•Hero Section with asymmetric layout, gradient background, and glassmorphic signup form
•Features Grid with 3 highlight cards in an asymmetric 2+1 layout (AI-Powered Writing, Real-Time Suggestions, Seamless Integration)
•Product Teaser with mockup image and descriptive content
•Testimonial Carousel with 3 sample quotes, navigation controls, and smooth transitions
•Fixed Navigation with smooth scroll anchors
•Rich Footer with company info, blog, about us, contact, and social media icons
Limitations
SEO optimization is available but requires upgrading to Pro or above. The free plan covers publishing but not advanced SEO features.
Pricing
•Free: Publishing included, basic features, 300 daily free credits
•Pro: $20/month (1,900 credits/month. SEO optimization)
Who Should Use It
Anyone who wants a production-ready landing page without paying to publish. The design quality and UX writing are strong enough for real product launches. Founders who need to ship fast will appreciate that the free plan includes deployment.
2. Base44
Score: 9/10
Best For: Full application building with transparent AI reasoning
Base44 impressed us with transparent AI thinking, good design quality, and realistic user testimonials. The free plan allows publishing, and the platform treats your landing page as a full application with user management, analytics, and integrations.
What Makes It Stand Out
The AI reasoning is fully visible. When we entered our QuillSpark prompt, Base44 showed its complete plan:
"I'll create a stunning, world-class landing page for QuillSpark with a luxurious, minimal design featuring lavender, cream, and midnight blue."
It then outlined each component:
•Hero Section — Captivating headline, subtext, early-access signup form with soft gradient background
•Features Grid — 3 elegant highlight cards showcasing key benefits
•Product Teaser — Mock image placeholder with floating UI elements
•Testimonial Carousel — Smooth animated carousel with 3 quotes
•Footer — Clean social links and branding
The color palette was explicit: Lavender (#E8E0F0), Cream (#FAF8F5), Midnight Blue (#1A1F3C), accent purples.
We watched it write each component: Hero → Feature Card → Features Grid → Product Teaser → Testimonial Carousel → Footer → Home Page assembly.
Our Testing Experience
The app management features go beyond typical landing page builders:
•Overview dashboard with app stats
•Users management — invite users, control access
•Data and Analytics (beta)
•Domains — connect custom domains
•Integrations — connect external services
•Security settings
•Code access — view and edit code
•Agents and Automations
•API access
You can control app visibility (public or invite-only), share your app link, and even hide the "Edit with Base44" platform badge.
Limitations
The credit-based system requires planning for complex projects. The platform is designed for full applications, so the interface may feel more complex than needed for simple landing pages.
Pricing
•Free: Can publish, limited credits
•Starter: $16/month (100 credits/month, 2K integration credits)
•Builder: $28/month (250 credits/month, custom domains, GitHub integration)
•Pro: $56/month (500 credits/month, early access features)
•Elite: $112/month (1,200 credits/month)
Who Should Use It
Founders who want to understand what the AI is building will appreciate the transparent reasoning. Teams needing more than just a landing page. with user management, analytics, and integrations, benefit from the full application capabilities.
3. Aura
Score: 8/10
Best For: Designers who want AI assistance with Figma integration
Aura combines AI generation with extensive design control. The platform uses Gemini 3 Pro for generation and provides granular editing options for fonts, colors, assets, and code.
What Makes It Stand Out
The generated output was polished and complete. Our QuillSpark page included:
•Navigation: Features, Methodology, Pricing, Login links
•Hero: "Write with intention. Spark creativity." headline with email signup form
•Product Mock: A realistic editor interface (quillspark_editor.tsx) showing the AI in action
•Features: Contextual Awareness, Tone Calibration, Instant Polishing
•Social Proof: "Loved by early adopters — Join 5,000+ writers"
•Testimonials: Three detailed quotes with names, initials, and roles (Elena R./Substack Writer, Marcus J./Content Strategist, Sarah A./Freelance Copywriter)
•Footer: Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Contact links
The design featured a deep midnight blue background (#05050A) with subtle indigo/lavender ambient glows. The AI used Inter font with tracking adjustments for a modern "Linear-style" aesthetic. UI components use glassmorphism effects (backdrop-blur, white opacity borders).
Our Testing Experience
After generation, Aura provides extensive editing options:
•Default view — See the rendered page
•Edits panel — Ask for revisions in natural language
•Prompt Builder — Refine your original prompt
•Preview — Live preview of changes
•Design — Visual design adjustments
•Code — View and copy HTML/CSS/JS
•Fonts — Typography controls
•Colors — Color palette editor
•Assets — Image and icon management
You can also import from Figma to use designs you've already saved there.
Limitations
Exporting requires a paid plan. You can generate and edit freely after signup, but publishing or exporting the website requires upgrading.
Pricing
•Free: Full generation and editing after signup
•Pro $16.67/month which bill annually: Export and custom domains (check website for current pricing)
Who Should Use It
Design teams already using Figma will appreciate the import capability. Anyone who wants granular control over typography, colors, and code will benefit from Aura's detailed editing panels.
4. Simplepages AI
Score: 8/10
Best For: Fastest prompt-to-publish workflow
Simplepages AI is radically simple. Enter prompt, AI thinks, pages build, hit publish, choose custom domain. That's the entire workflow.
What Makes It Stand Out
The streamlined process eliminates all friction:
1.Enter your prompt
2.AI thinking (shows processing)
3.Building pages (automatic)
4.Hit publish
5.Choose custom domain name
No account setup maze, no template browsing, no feature overload. You describe what you want and you're live.
Our Testing Experience
We entered the QuillSpark prompt and watched the AI process. The workflow was exactly as advertised; minimal steps from idea to published page.
The generated output included:
•Hero Section: Clean headline with subtext and email capture form
•Features Grid: 3 benefit cards with icons and descriptions
•Product Preview: Mockup placeholder with supporting copy
•Testimonials: Basic quote section with attribution
The design approach was clean and functional:
•Typography: System fonts (likely Inter or similar sans-serif) with clear hierarchy
•Colors: Neutral palette with a single accent color for CTAs
•Layout: Standard single-column flow, mobile-responsive
•Spacing: Generous whitespace, easy to scan
The result was professional but not distinctive. It looks like a competent landing page, not a custom-designed one. This is the trade-off for speed.
Limitations
The simplicity means fewer customization options. What the AI generates is largely what you keep. No detailed editing panels like Aura, no transparent reasoning like Manus. If you want to tweak typography or adjust the color system, you'll need to work with the code directly.
Pricing
•Free: Basic 2 pages generation and publishing (5 prompts allowed)
•Build: $9/month. 15 pages. Advanced features such as branding removal.
•Grow: $29/month. 50 pages. More advanced features such as automation & integration
Who Should Use It
Anyone who values speed over customization. If you need a landing page live in minutes and don't need extensive editing capabilities, Simplepages delivers the fastest path.
5. Emergent AI
Score: 7/10
Best For: Users who want AI to ask clarifying questions
Emergent AI takes an interactive approach, asking questions during the generation process to ensure it understands your requirements.
What Makes It Stand Out
The AI frames your project ambitiously: "This landing page is your conversion engine; the bridge between announcing QuillSpark and building a community of early adopters."
During generation, the AI asked clarifying questions about:
•Frontend requirements
•Specific color usage
•Social media links (Twitter, LinkedIn, GitHub)
•Other configuration options
This interactive approach ensures the output matches your intent, though it adds time to the process.
Our Testing Experience
After answering the clarifying questions, Emergent built the QuillSpark landing page with these components:
•Hero Section: Headline with early-access signup form
•Features Grid: 3 cards highlighting key benefits
•Product Preview: AI-generated mockup image via Image Agent
•Social Proof: Basic testimonial section
•Footer: Links and social media icons based on our answers
The design approach was functional but less refined:
•Typography: Standard sans-serif fonts, adequate hierarchy but not distinctive
•Colors: Used the colors we specified in Q&A, but application was basic
•Layout: Clean single-column structure, responsive
•Images: Generated via Image Agent—usable but generic quality
The result was functional but basic compared to Manus. The AI created the required sections, generated images through an Image Agent, and built the frontend structure. The overall quality was acceptable but not as polished as the top performers.
Limitations
You need to upgrade to publish. The free tier lets you build but not deploy.
The design quality is more basic than Manus or Base44. The interactive question-asking process takes longer than tools that generate immediately.
Pricing
•Free: 5-10 credits/month (sandbox for experimentation, can't deploy)
•Standard: $20/month (100 credits/month, can deploy)
•Pro: $200/month (750 credits/month, 1M context window, custom agents)
Who Should Use It
Users who prefer an AI that asks questions rather than making assumptions. If you want more control over the generation process through dialogue, Emergent's approach may suit you.
Note: the free tier is limited to experimentation which means you'll need Standard ($20/month) to deploy live pages.
6. Squarespace (With Blueprint AI)
Score: 6/10
Best For: Users who prefer guided step-by-step decisions
Squarespace doesn't use free-form prompts. Instead, everything is broken down into blocks of decisions that you follow to build a more controllable, editable landing page.
What Makes It Stand Out
The 7-step guided process:
1.Personalize your site header and logo
2.Customize your brand style
3.Manage site navigation
4.Set up scheduling (optional)
5.Set up your scheduling page
6.Add a scheduling page to your website
7.Download the mobile app / Start selling physical products
After completing the steps, you choose a custom domain and hit publish.
Our Testing Experience
We walked through Squarespace's guided process for the QuillSpark landing page. At each step, we made explicit choices:
Step 1 - Header & Logo:
•Uploaded a placeholder logo
•Set site title and tagline
Step 2 - Brand Style:
•Selected primary and secondary colors
•Chose from preset font combinations
•Picked a layout template
Step 3 - Navigation:
•Configured menu items
•Set up page structure
The resulting page included:
•Hero Section: Based on template selection with our uploaded assets
•Features: Block-based layout we configured step-by-step
•Contact/Scheduling: Integrated booking functionality
•Footer: Auto-generated based on earlier inputs
The design approach was template-driven:
•Typography: Limited to preset font pairings (professional but not custom)
•Colors: Our selections applied consistently across sections
•Layout: Structured blocks, less creative flexibility than prompt-based tools
•Components: Pre-built modules we assembled rather than AI-generated sections
The output was clean and functional, closer to a traditional website builder with AI assistance than a true AI generator.
The block-based approach provides more control at each stage. You're making explicit decisions rather than hoping the AI interprets your prompt correctly. This works well for users who prefer structure over open-ended generation.
Limitations
You need to upgrade to publish. The free tier allows building but not deployment.
The guided approach takes longer than prompt-based tools. If you know what you want, typing a single detailed prompt is faster than answering 7 steps of questions.
Pricing
•Basic: $16/month
•Core: $23/month
•Advanced: $33/month
Annual billing saves 26-31%
Who Should Use It
Users who feel overwhelmed by free-form prompts. If you prefer making discrete decisions at each step rather than describing everything upfront, Squarespace's structured approach reduces uncertainty.
7. Involve.me
Score: 4/10
Best For: Interactive quizzes and calculators (NOT AI landing pages)
Involve.me advertises AI-powered page creation, but our testing revealed it doesn't function as an AI landing page generator.
What Makes It Stand Out
Involve.me is designed for interactive content, such as quizzes, calculators, surveys, and multi-step forms. The platform includes:
•Drag-and-drop element library
•Conditional logic for branching experiences
•Payment and lead capture integrations
•Analytics for conversion tracking
These features make sense for interactive funnels, but not for generating landing pages from prompts.
Our Testing Experience
We entered our QuillSpark prompt. The AI initiated an extensive automated process:
"I'll first inspect your current pages and design settings, then reshape the funnel into a single landing page tailored Thank You..."
The system executed numerous operations:
•Getting the list of pages
•Reading funnel config
•Reading multiple page IDs
•Updating funnel config
•Adding 11 components
•Removing 10 components
•Updating content element configs
•Attempting to set custom labels (hit path error)
•Fixing character encoding issues
After all this activity, the result was a blank page.
The tool then asked us to design the page manually using their element library. Each AI text generation costs 0.1–0.5 credits, and the free trial provides only 5 credits, not enough to build a complete page.
Limitation
Involve.me doesn't qualify as an AI landing page builder based on our testing. It's better described as an interactive content builder for quizzes, calculators, and conditional forms. For those specific use cases, it may work, but for generating landing pages from prompts, it failed.
Pricing
•Free: 5 credits (very limited)
•Starter: $29/month
•Professional: $69/month
•Business: $149/month
Who Should Use It
Only if you specifically need interactive quizzes or calculators and are comfortable building manually. For AI-generated landing pages, use any other tool on this list.
Which AI Landing Page Generator Should You Choose?
Based on our testing, here's how to decide:
For production-ready quality with free publishing: Choose Manus. The design quality, UX writing, and mobile-friendliness are exceptional. Publishing is free; you only pay if you want advanced SEO optimization.
For transparent AI reasoning and full app capabilities: Choose Base44. Watching the AI plan and build each component is valuable, and the platform scales beyond simple landing pages into full applications with user management and integrations. Free plan includes publishing.
For design control and Figma users: Choose Aura. The editing panels for fonts, colors, assets, and code provide granular control. Figma import bridges your existing design workflow. You'll need to upgrade to export.
For maximum speed: Choose Simplepages AI. Fastest path from prompt to published page with minimal friction.
For AI that asks questions: Choose Emergent AI. The interactive approach ensures the AI understands your requirements, though you'll need a paid plan to publish.
For guided step-by-step building: Choose Squarespace. If free-form prompts feel overwhelming, the structured 7-step process provides clarity, but requires a paid plan to publish.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which free option is best?
Manus offers the best free experience, production-ready design quality and free publishing. Base44 is a close second with transparent AI reasoning and free publishing. Aura and Simplepages have free tiers but Aura requires payment to export.
Do I need design skills?
No. Manus, Base44, Simplepages, and Emergent handle design automatically. Aura offers more design control if you want it. Squarespace guides you through decisions step-by-step.
How long does it take to create a landing page?
•Simplepages AI: 2–3 minutes (fastest)
•Base44: 5–10 minutes
•Aura: 5–10 minutes
•Manus: 5–15 minutes (most thorough)
•Emergent AI: 10–15 minutes (includes Q&A)
•Squarespace: 15–20 minutes (guided steps)
Can I get SEO optimization?
Manus offers SEO optimization on Pro plans. Other tools provide basic SEO (meta tags, clean code) but not advanced optimization.
Which tools let me publish for free?
•Manus — Free publishing included
•Base44 — Free publishing included
•Simplepages AI — Free publishing included
The others (Aura, Emergent, Squarespace , Involve.me) require paid plans to publish or export.
Conclusion
Most AI landing page generators let you build for free but charge to publish. This creates a frustrating experience, that you invest time creating something, only to hit a paywall at the finish line.
Three tools break this pattern: Manus, Base44, and Simplepages AI all let you publish without payment.
Of these, Manus delivers the highest design quality. The Modern Minimalism aesthetic, sophisticated typography system, and scroll-triggered animations create pages that look professionally designed, not AI-generated. If your landing page needs to convert visitors into customers, this polish matters.
Base44 is the better choice if you're building beyond a single landing page. The transparent AI reasoning, user management features, and integration capabilities make it a platform for growth, not just a page generator.
Start with whichever matches your immediate need. Both are free to try, free to publish, and produce professional results.